期刊
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY
卷 147, 期 4, 页码 975-993出版社
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007783
关键词
-
类别
资金
- American Association of Plastic Surgeons
The consensus conference conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on surgical treatment and prevention of upper and lower extremity lymphedema, finding evidence to support the effectiveness of lymphovenous anastomosis and vascular lymph node transplantation in reducing severity. However, there is no consensus on which procedure is more effective. Prophylactic lymphovenous bypass may reduce the incidence of lymphedema, and debulking procedures like liposuction are effective in addressing nonfluid components of lymphedema.
Background: The goal of this consensus conference, sponsored by the American Association of Plastic Surgeons, was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials to examine both the benefits and risks of surgical treatment and surgical prevention of upper and lower extremity lymphedema. Methods: The panel met in Boston for a 3-day, face-to-face meeting in July of 2017. After an exhaustive review of the existing literature, the authors created consensus recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria. Important directions for future research were also identified. Results: There is evidence to support that lymphovenous anastomosis can be effective in reducing severity of lymphedema (grade 1C). There is evidence to support that vascular lymph node transplantation can be effective in reducing severity of lymphedema (grade 1B). Currently, there is no consensus on which procedure (lymphovenous bypass versus vascular lymph node transplantation) is more effective (grade 2C). A few studies show that prophylactic lymphovenous bypass in patients undergoing extremity lymphadenectomy may reduce the incidence of lymphedema (grade 1B). More studies with longer follow-up are required to confirm this benefit. Debulking procedures such as liposuction are effective in addressing a nonfluid component such as fat involving lymphedema (grade 1C). There is a role for liposuction combined with physiologic procedures although the timing of each procedure is currently unresolved (grade 1C). Conclusions: Many studies seem to support some efficacy of lymphovenous bypass and vascular lymph node transplantation. Many studies show the important role of lymphedema therapy and other procedures such as liposuction and debulking. The management of lymphedema is a challenging field with many promising advances. However, many questions remain unanswered.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据