4.6 Article

Altered resonance properties of somatosensory responses in mice deficient for the schizophrenia risk gene Neuregulin 1

期刊

BRAIN STRUCTURE & FUNCTION
卷 221, 期 9, 页码 4383-4398

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00429-015-1169-6

关键词

Schizophrenia; Neuregulin 1; Resonance; Adaptation; Synchrony; Somatosensory cortex; Endophenotypes

资金

  1. Schizophrenia and Autism of the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG) [IRTG 1328]
  2. Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research (IZKF Aachen) within the Faculty of Medicine at the RWTH Aachen University
  3. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale [SPE20070709864]
  4. Barrel Cortex Function (BaCo-Fun) research group of the DFG
  5. Helmholtz association
  6. National Institute of Health (NIH) [MH064045, P50-MH096891, R01 EY020765]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To reveal the neuronal underpinnings of sensory processing deficits in patients with schizophrenia, previous studies have investigated brain activity in response to sustained sensory stimulation at various frequencies. This paradigm evoked neural activity at the stimulation frequency and harmonics thereof. During visual and auditory stimulation that elicited enhanced or 'resonant' responses in healthy controls, patients with schizophrenia displayed reduced activity. The present study sought to elucidate the cellular basis of disease-related deficits in sensory resonance properties using mice heterozygous for the schizophrenia susceptibility gene Neuregulin 1 (NRG1). We applied repetitive whisker stimulation at 1-15 Hz, a range relevant to whisking behavior in mice, and measured cellular activity in the primary somatosensory cortex. At frequencies where control mice displayed enhancements in measures of response magnitude and precision, NRG1 (+/-) mutants showed reductions. Our results demonstrate for the first time a link between a mutation of a schizophrenia risk gene and altered neuronal resonance properties in sensory cortex.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据