4.7 Article

Greater celandine (Chelidonium majus L.) for COVID-19: A twenty-case series

期刊

PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH
卷 35, 期 7, 页码 3792-3798

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ptr.7085

关键词

case series; Chelidonium majus; COVID-19; greater celandine; phytotherapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A study on the use of greater celandine in treating COVID-19 outpatients revealed that most patients experienced complete or near complete clinical improvement within 1-9 days of treatment, with symptoms such as fever, fatigue, cough, sore throat, coryza, anosmia, ageusia, and headache. This small case series may inspire further research on Chelidonium majus as a potential therapeutic option for COVID-19.
In December 2019, an outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) occurred in Wuhan, China, with a rapid increase in cases worldwide. Until now, among several drugs tested, none demonstrated sufficient efficacy for its etiological treatment. Greater celandine (Chelidonium majus L.) is a well-known medicinal plant, traditionally indicated for digestive disorders and topically to remove warts. This study, performed at private offices in Sao Paulo and Aracaju (Brazil), describes 20 consecutive COVID-19 outpatients treated with greater celandine and their clinical evolution. The patients, aged 14-71 years (median of 41 years), were treated with Chelidonium majus 10% mother tincture, 20-30 drops three times a day for 3-12 days (median of 5 days). Clinical features were assessed during the treatment and at least until 1 week after its end. These cases were considered mild, as most COVID-19 cases. The symptoms were mainly fever, fatigue, cough, sore throat, coryza, anosmia, ageusia, and headache. Ten patients had comorbidities, such as hypertension, diabetes, and overweight. Complete or almost complete clinical improvement occurred within 1-9 days of treatment (median of 3 days). There were no adverse events. This casuistry, although small, may inspire other researchers to continue investigating Chelidonium majus as a healing treatment for COVID-19.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据