4.7 Article

Bioactive metabolites from the desert plant-associated endophytic fungus Chaetomium globosum (Chaetomiaceae)

期刊

PHYTOCHEMISTRY
卷 185, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2021.112701

关键词

Desert plant; Artemisia desterorum; Asteraceae; Endophytic fungus; Chaetomium globosum; Chaetomiaceae; Globosumin; Globosumone; Bioactivities

资金

  1. CAMS Initiative for Innovative Medicine [2017-I2M-4-004]
  2. Key project at central government level: The ability establishment of sustainable use for valuable Chinese medicine resources [2060302-1904-30]
  3. National Major Increase or Decrease Project-Construction of the Sustainable Utilization Capacity of Famous Traditional Chinese Medicine Resources [2060302]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

New metabolites globosumin and globosumone were isolated from the endophytic fungus Chaetomium globosum, showing inhibitory effects on Arabidopsis thaliana seedling growth and cancer cell lines A549 and HepG2, with Chaetoglobosin A demonstrating dose-dependent biological activity.
Globosumin, an undescribed chromene-4,7(4aH)-dione-tetramic acid PKS-PKS-NRPS hybrid, and globosumone, an undescribed azaphilone, together with ten known metabolites, were isolated from the desert plant-associated endophytic fungus Chaetomium globosum (Chaetomiaceae). The planar structures and relative configurations of globosumin and globosumone were determined by high-resolution ESI-MS and NMR data, and the absolute configurations of these two metabolites were determined by electronic circular dichroism (ECD) and circular dichroism (CD) combined with time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT)-based quantum-chemical calculations. Chaetoglobosin A displayed biological effects against the seedling growth of Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae) in a dose-dependent manner, and this compound also exhibited biological activity against two cancer cell lines, A549 and HepG2, with IC50 values of 6.82 +/- 2.34 and 38.62 +/- 7.44 mu M, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据