4.7 Article

Peplomer bulb shape and coronavirus rotational diffusivity

期刊

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
卷 33, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0048626

关键词

-

资金

  1. Canada Research Chairs program of the Government of Canada
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  3. Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship
  4. Mitacs Research Training Award
  5. Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering of Queen's University at Kingston
  6. Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University
  7. Cabinet Office, Government of Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the rotational diffusivity of coronavirus particles in suspension was calculated using general rigid bead-rod theory. It was found that the triangular shape of the spike bulbs significantly decreases the rotational diffusivity of the virus particles.
Recently, the rotational diffusivity of the coronavirus particle in suspension was calculated, from first principles, using general rigid bead-rod theory [M. A. Kanso, Phys. Fluids 32, 113101 (2020)]. We did so by beading the capsid and then also by replacing each of its bulbous spikes with a single bead. However, each coronavirus spike is a glycoprotein trimer, and each spike bulb is triangular. In this work, we replace each bulbous coronavirus spike with a bead triplet, where each bead of the triplet is charged identically. This paper, thus, explores the role of bulb triangularity on the rotational diffusivity, an effect not previously considered. We thus use energy minimization for the spreading of triangular bulbs over the spherical capsid. The latter both translates and twists the coronavirus spikes relative to one another, and we then next arrive at the rotational diffusivity of the coronavirus particle in suspension, from first principles. We learn that the triangularity of the coronavirus spike bulb decreases its rotational diffusivity. For a typical peplomer population of 74, bulb triangularity decreases the rotational diffusivity by 39 %.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据