4.5 Article

Computational ghost imaging with 4-step iterative rank minimization

期刊

PHYSICS LETTERS A
卷 394, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2021.127199

关键词

Computational ghost imaging; Sub-Nyquist sampling ratio; Image enhancement; Weighted nuclear norm minimization

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61805048, 61803093, 61704112, 61701123, U2001201, U1801263, U1701262]
  2. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Cyber-Physical System [2016B030301008]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2018A030310599]
  4. Application Technologies R&D Pro-gram of Guangdong Province [2015B090922013]
  5. National HighResolution Earth Observation Major Project [83-Y40G33-900118/20]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The proposal of a rank-minimization-based computational ghost imaging scheme results in the acquisition of clear ghost images in sub-Nyquist sampling ratio conditions. The scheme outperforms other methods in both numerical and practical experiments, demonstrating significant improvement in image quality and potential applications in various fields.
We propose a rank-minimization-based computational ghost imaging (CGI) scheme to acquire clear ghost images in sub-Nyquist sampling ratio (SR) conditions. The proposed scheme uses a 4-step iterative method that is composed of block matching, weighted nuclear norm minimization, aggregation and projection for the CGI image reconstruction. Both numerical and practical experiments are implemented, and the results are compared with those of four recently published works, Russian dolls CGI, 4-connected-region-based CGI, Cake-Cutting CGI, and compressive-sensing-based CGI. The comparison results demonstrate that the image quality of the proposed scheme is dramatically enhanced and outperforms the other four methods. The proposed scheme can be used in many practical application areas, such as remote sensing, underwater and X-ray CGI. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据