4.5 Article

Machine learning based modeling for future prospects of land use land cover change in Gopalganj District, Bangladesh

期刊

PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH
卷 126, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pce.2021.103022

关键词

Remote sensing; Artificial neural network (ANN); Land use & land cover (LULC); Cellular automata (CA); Sustainable development

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study observes the fluctuations in land use and land cover in Gopalganj district over the past two decades and predicts future developments. The research reveals that built-up areas have increased while urban vegetation has declined. By using simulation models, it is predicted that urban areas will continue to expand and urban vegetation will decrease in the coming decades.
During the last decade, urban growth has been increased rapidly in Gopalganj district of Bangladesh. Therefore, this study seeks to observe fluctuations in land use and land cover (LULC) in Gopalganj with its effects over the past two decades. Through Landsat 5 (TM) and 8 (OLI) data, this research focuses on Maximum Likelihood Supervised Classification (MLSC) technique for creating land-use classes of different years. Built-up areas have increased by 21.17% over the last two decades. Urban vegetation has declined in parallel with the increase in vacant land in the district from 2000 to 2010. However, in the next ten years, it has occupied about 72.76 square km of bare-land. By using Artificial Neural Network (ANN) with integrated cellular automation (CA) simulation, the model predicted that urban areas would grow by 10.88% in the central and north-western regions of the district by 2050. Urban vegetation will decrease by 4.09%, with a significant reduction in bare land and water bodies. The accuracy of the predicted LULC is 89.48% based on validation result. This prediction may help municipal and administrative authorities, urban planners to achieve a planned and sustainable future city of Gopalganj.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据