4.6 Article

Structural and ultraviolet photo-detection properties of laser molecular beam epitaxy grown GaN layers using solid GaN and liquid Ga targets

期刊

PHYSICA SCRIPTA
卷 96, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1402-4896/abfcef

关键词

GaN; heteroepitaxy; x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy; photodetector

资金

  1. University Grant Commission (UGC), India
  2. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The influence of using different types of GaN targets on the surface morphology and structural quality of GaN epilayers was studied, with confirmation through X-ray rocking curve measurements and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Further investigation was conducted on the effect of threading dislocation density on the ultraviolet photoresponse properties of GaN layers using metal-semiconductor-metal structures.
GaN epitaxial layers have been grown on sapphire (0001) substrate by laser molecular beam epitaxy technique using laser ablation of polycrystalline GaN solid and liquid Ga metal targets in the ambient of nitrogen plasma. In-situ reflection high energy electron diffraction and exsitu atomic force microscopy observations revealed that GaN growth using solid target yields rough surface under three-dimensional growth mode while a flat surface GaN is obtained using liquid Ga target. From X-ray rocking curve measurement, it is also observed that the GaN layer grown using solid GaN target has a relatively better structural quality. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy confirmed Ga-N bond formation and near-stoichiometric composition of the GaN epilayers. The influence of threading dislocation density on the ultraviolet (UV) photoresponse properties of GaN layers have been studied using metal-semiconductor-metal (MSM) based device structure. It is found that the GaN MSM structure obtained using solid GaN target with lesser screw and dislocation densities exhibits a higher responsivity with fast response and recovery time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据