4.6 Article

Children are important too: juvenile playgroups and maternal childcare in a foraging population, the Agta

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0026

关键词

childcare; playgroups; grandmothers; allomothering; support; hunter– gatherers

类别

资金

  1. MRC
  2. DFID [MR/P014216/1]
  3. Leverhulme Trust [RP2011-R 045]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research shows that allomaternal caregiving is associated with reduced maternal caregiving, with varying substitutive effects, and children-only playgroups can significantly decrease maternal caregiving; although grandmothers are rarely available for caregiving, their presence is linked to decreased maternal caregiving.
Non-maternal carers (allomothers) are hypothesized to lighten the mother's workload, allowing for the specialized human life history including relatively short interbirth intervals and multiple dependent offspring. Here, using in-depth observational data on childcare provided to 78 Agta children (a foraging population in the northern Philippines; aged 0-6 years), we explore whether allomaternal childcare substitutes and decreases maternal childcare. We found that allomother caregiving was associated with reduced maternal childcare, but the substitutive effect varied depending on the source and type of care. Children-only playgroups consistently predicted a decrease in maternal childcare. While grandmothers were rarely available, their presence was negatively associated with maternal presence and childcare, and grandmothers performed similar childcare activities to mothers. These results underscore the importance of allomothering in reducing maternal childcare in the Agta. Our findings suggest that flexibility in childcare sources, including children-only playgroups, may have been the key to human life-history evolution. Overall, our results reinforce the necessity of a broad conceptualization of social support in human childcare. This article is part of the theme issue 'Multidisciplinary perspectives on social support and maternal-child health'.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据