4.4 Article

The association between the use of ivermectin and mortality in patients with COVID-19: a meta-analysis

期刊

PHARMACOLOGICAL REPORTS
卷 73, 期 5, 页码 1473-1479

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s43440-021-00245-z

关键词

Bias; Clinical trial; COVID-19; Ivermectin; Mortality

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The meta-analysis showed a preliminary beneficial effect of ivermectin on mortality in patients with COVID-19, indicating the need for further large-scale randomized controlled trials to confirm these findings.
Objective The effect of ivermectin on mortality in patients with novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been investigated in many studies. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to investigate the overall effect of ivermectin on the risk of mortality in patients with COVID-19. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar, and preprint repository databases (up to February 28, 2021). Random-effects and inverse variance heterogeneity meta-analysis were used to pool the odds ratio of individual trials. The risk of bias was appraised using Version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. Results Six randomized controlled trials were included in this analysis with a total of 658 patients who were randomized to receive ivermectin and 597 patients randomized in the control group who did not receive ivermectin. Of six trials, four had an overall high risk of bias. The estimated effect of ivermectin indicated mortality benefits (pooled odds ratio = 0.21; 95% confidence interval 0.11-0.42, n = 1255), with some evidence against the hypothesis of 'no significant difference' at the current sample size. Conclusion We observed a preliminary beneficial effect on mortality associated with ivermectin use in patients with COVID-19 that warrants further clinical evidence in appropriately designed large-scale randomized controlled trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据