4.7 Article

Glyphosate ban in Mexico: potential impacts on agriculture and weed management

期刊

PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
卷 77, 期 9, 页码 3820-3831

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/ps.6362

关键词

benefit– risk ratio; glyphosate restriction; integrated weed management; herbicide resistance; health risks; pesticide risk reduction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Mexican government has decreed a ban on glyphosate starting in 2024, but there are no safer alternatives in the current agricultural setting, leading to potential impacts such as decreased crop yields and increased food prices.
Since glyphosate was classified as potentially carcinogenic by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, public debate regarding the environmental impact and health risks from its use has intensified. Almost all regulatory agencies throughout the world have concluded that the judicious use of glyphosate does not pose risks to the environment and human health. However, on the last day of 2020 the Mexican government decreed a ban of this herbicide beginning January, 2024. In current Mexican agriculture there are no safer chemical and/or other weed management technologies that allow for the economical substitution of glyphosate for weed control. Many Mexican weed scientists agree that glyphosate use should be reduced, but not banned outright. This decree could have more negative economic and social consequences as well as environmental and human health risks than benefits, which could compromise the country & apos;s food and public security. Crop yields are projected by some to decline by up to 40% with this ban, increasing food prices, making food less accessible to low-income consumers. In addition, a black market for the smuggling and illegal sale of glyphosate is possible. The possible environmental, economic and social impacts caused by the glyphosate ban in Mexico are discussed, emphasizing the impact on weed management. (c) 2021 Society of Chemical Industry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据