4.0 Article

Analysis of lesional color to differentiate infantile hemangiomas from port-wine birthmarks in infants less than 3 months old: A pilot study

期刊

PEDIATRIC DERMATOLOGY
卷 38, 期 3, 页码 585-590

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pde.14554

关键词

colorimetry; diagnosis; infantile hemangioma; machine learning; port‐ wine birthmark

资金

  1. MedStar Health Research Institute New Investigator Associate Giving Grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electronic colorimeters, particularly focusing on blue and green values, demonstrate a high accuracy in distinguishing between port-wine birthmarks (PWB) and infantile hemangiomas (IH) regardless of thickness. Further large-scale evaluation is needed.
Background In their early phase, infantile hemangiomas (IH) can sometimes be difficult to differentiate from port-wine birthmarks (PWB). Until recently, inexpensive diagnostic tools have not been readily available. Objective To determine the diagnostic utility of widely available colorimetric technology when differentiating PWB from IH in photographs of infants less than 3 months old. Methods Multi-center, retrospective analysis of RGB (red, green, and blue) and HSL (hue, saturation, lightness) values collected using electronic colorimeters from images of clinically confirmed untreated IH or PWB. Subgroup analysis of flat vascular birthmarks was subsequently performed. Results Images of 119 IH (specifically, 45 flat IH) and 59 PWB were identified. PWB had significantly (P < .001) higher RGB values of all primary colors, most notably for blue and green (mean difference: >50), irrespective of thickness. RGB or RGB with HSL values had an excellent accuracy (90%), sensitivity (92%), specificity (98%), and positive predictive value (98%) when discriminating PWB from flat IH. IH could be distinctly clustered from PWB when combining their RGB with HSL values. Conclusion Electronic colorimeters with emphasis on blue and green values, are able to differentiate PWB from IH, irrespective of thickness, with a high degree of accuracy. A larger scale evaluation is now required.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据