4.5 Article

A new method of hybrid time window embedding with transformer-based traffic data classification in IoT-networked environment

期刊

PATTERN ANALYSIS AND APPLICATIONS
卷 24, 期 4, 页码 1441-1449

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10044-021-00980-2

关键词

Deep learning; Transformers; Anomaly detection

资金

  1. European Union [833115]
  2. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [833115] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Internet of Things (IoT) devices may expose sensitive data, highlighting the need for protection and early warning systems. This paper proposes a time window embedding solution using a core anomaly detection unit and compares it with classical machine-learning algorithms through experiments on the Aposemat IoT-23 dataset. The proposed method's effectiveness in IoT contexts is demonstrated through the evaluation of various machine-learning schemes.
The Internet of Things (IoT) appliances often expose sensitive data, either directly or indirectly. They may, for instance, tell whether you are at home right now or what your long or short-term habits are. Therefore, it is crucial to protect such devices against adversaries and has in place an early warning system which indicates compromised devices in a quick and efficient manner. In this paper, we propose time window embedding solutions that efficiently process a massive amount of data and have a low-memory-footprint at the same time. On top of the proposed embedding vectors, we use the core anomaly detection unit. It is a classifier that is based on the transformer's encoder component followed by a feed-forward neural network. We have compared the proposed method with other classical machine-learning algorithms. Therefore, in the paper, we formally evaluate various machine-learning schemes and discuss their effectiveness in the IoT-related context. Our proposal is supported by detailed experiments that have been conducted on the recently published Aposemat IoT-23 dataset.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据