期刊
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
卷 105, 期 1, 页码 114-127出版社
ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.05.005
关键词
Shared decision making; Timeout; breast cancer care; Implementation; Implementation science; barriers and; facilitators
资金
- Zilveren Kruis Healthcare Insurance Company
- Dutch Ministry of Health [Z670]
The evaluation of a multilevel implementation program on shared decision making (SDM) for breast cancer clinicians showed that the program supported clinicians to adopt SDM and helped internalize the SDM theory. Common barriers reported by clinicians included limited financial means, time constraints, and concurrent activities.
Objective: Evaluation of a multilevel implementation program on shared decision making (SDM) for breast cancer clinicians. Methods: The program was based on the 'Measurement Instrument for Determinants of Innovations-model' (MIDI). Key factors for effective implementation were included. Eleven breast cancer teams selected from two geographical areas participated; first six surgery teams and second five systemic therapy teams. A mixed method evaluation was carried out at the end of each period: Descriptive statistics were used for surveys and thematic content analysis for semi-structured interviews. Results: Twenty-eight clinicians returned the questionnaire (42%). Clinicians (96%) endorse that SDM is relevant to breast cancer care. The program supported adoption of SDM in their practice. Limited financial means, time constraints and concurrent activities were frequently reported barriers. Interviews (n = 21) showed that using a 4-step SDM model - when reinforced by practical examples, handy cards, feedback and training - helped to internalize SDM theory. Clinicians experienced positive results for their patients and themselves. Task re-assignment and flexible outpatient planning reinforce sustainable change. Patient involvement was valued. Conclusion: Our program supported breast cancer clinicians to adopt SDM. Practice Implications: To implement SDM, multilevel approaches are needed that reinforce intrinsic motivation by demonstrating benefits for patients and clinicians. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. CC_BY_4.0
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据