4.6 Article

From Bench to Plant: An Opportunity for Transition Metal Paired Electrocatalysis

期刊

ORGANIC PROCESS RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
卷 25, 期 12, 页码 2581-2586

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.oprd.1c00046

关键词

electrochemistry; catalysis; paired electrolysis; transition metal

资金

  1. CNRS
  2. French Ministry of Research
  3. University of Lyon I.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article discusses the applications of electrochemistry and transition metal catalysis in medicinal and process chemistry, explores the difficulties in scaling up transition metal electrocatalysis from the lab to the industry, and argues that intrinsic characteristics related to different electrocatalytic modes are responsible for the absence of transition metal electrocatalysis in large-scale process chemistry.
Electrochemistry and transition metal catalysis are gigantic fields from which several methodologies have found applications in both medicinal and process chemistry. Surprisingly, the transfer from bench to plant is much more difficult for transition metal electrocatalysis. While a plethora of those transformations have emerged in the landscape of medicinal chemistry over more than 50 years, they were not further developed on a larger scale. Of course, extra parameters have to be considered when an electrocatalytic reaction is run, but they cannot justify the absence of transition metal electrocatalysis examples in process chemistry. This Perspective aims to demonstrate that intrinsic characteristics related to the different electrocatalytic modes are responsible for the absence of such processes on large scale. It will also highlight why paired electrocatalyzed reactions have the potential to fill the gap between medicinal and process chemistry. Finally, a strategy to develop unprecedented and process-oriented paired electrocatalyzed methods will be disclosed, and hopefully, this will motivate electropractitioners to study challenging and applicable transformations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据