4.6 Review

Structural and optoelectronic properties of hybrid halide perovskites for solar cells

期刊

ORGANIC ELECTRONICS
卷 91, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.orgel.2021.106077

关键词

Solar cells; Electronic properties; Optoelectronic; Perovskites

资金

  1. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [20520741100]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Trihalide perovskites are a class of materials with tunable energy band gap, showing potential for designing versatile optoelectronic devices. The relation between structural and optoelectronic properties is crucial for the performance of perovskite materials in various applications.
Trihalide perovskites are an emerging class of materials, which have shown excellent performance so far in solution-processed optoelectronic devices such as perovskite solar cells (PSCs) and light emitting diodes (LEDs). The energy band gap (Egap) of this class of materials is tunable and can be varied from 1.5 eV to 2.3 eV by changing its chemical composition, exhibiting a promising character to design versatile optoelectronic devices. It is thus, imperative to understand the relation between structural and optoelectronic properties of the perovskitebased materials offering intrinsic complexity. Hence, different interactions, defects as well as structural disorder have a defining role in the material properties. The intrinsic properties have been shown to have a significant impact on the performance of these perovskite materials. These properties include high dielectric constants, ambipolar transport features of long range, low exciton binding energies, and ferroelectric polarizations. In the current review, we briefly explore the crystal structure of the perovskite materials at atomistic-level and draw a comparison of the basic optical and electrical properties originating from particular atomic compositions together with their arrangements therein, and moreover, their applications in future optoelectronic devices are elaborated upon.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据