4.6 Article

High frequency of upper aerodigestive tract manifestations in mucous membrane pemphigoid

期刊

ORAL DISEASES
卷 28, 期 6, 页码 1555-1560

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/odi.13872

关键词

autoimmune diseases; bullous; pemphigoid; gingival diseases; laryngeal diseases; skin diseases

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to evaluate upper aerodigestive tract involvement in patients with mucous membrane pemphigoid associated with desquamative gingivitis, finding a significant association between symptoms, high oral disease activity score, and linear IgA deposition with upper aerodigestive tract lesions.
Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the frequency of upper aerodigestive tract involvement in patients with mucous membrane pemphigoid associated with desquamative gingivitis. Subjects and Methods. Data from 25 patients were collected by retrospective chart review. Their upper aerodigestive had been evaluated using a conventional flexible fiberscope. Oral disease activity was quantified on the basis of the Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid Disease Area Index activity score. Results Lesions of the upper aerodigestive tract were confirmed in nine symptomatic patients (9/25, 36%), of which five (5/25, 20%) had laryngeal involvement. No lesions were seen in the asymptomatic patients on fiberscope examination. There was a statistically significant difference in the symptoms, high oral disease activity score, and linear IgA deposition on direct immunofluorescence between patients with and without upper aerodigestive tract lesions (p = .001, .001, .002, respectively). Conclusion The high frequency of considerable complications highlights the importance of confirming the presence of upper aerodigestive tract involvement in patients with mucous membrane pemphigoid having desquamative gingivitis. Signs including the presence of symptoms, high oral disease activity score, or linear IgA deposition on direct immunofluorescence might indicate a higher risk of upper aerodigestive tract involvement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据