4.6 Article

Can amplified spontaneous emission produce intense laser guide stars for adaptive optics?

期刊

OPTICS LETTERS
卷 46, 期 8, 页码 1792-1795

出版社

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/OL.417910

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [RGPIN-2019-04369]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences, CAS President's Fellowship Initiative [2017VMA0013]
  3. Yunnan Provincial Department of Education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adaptive optics is crucial for ground-based optical and infrared astronomy, offering high angular resolution and sensitivity. Systems using laser guide stars have high sky coverage potential, but are limited by return flux availability. Amplified spontaneous emission has the potential to enhance beacon intensity, but requires a thick population inversion in an electronically dense transition, with atomic oxygen and nitrogen being potential candidates.
Adaptive optics is a key technology for ground-based optical and infrared astronomy, providing high angular resolution and sensitivity. Systems employing laser guide stars can achieve high sky coverage, but their performance is limited by the available return flux. Amplified spontaneous emission could potentially boost the intensity of beacons produced by resonant excitation of atomic or molecular species in the upper atmosphere. This requires the production of a population inversion in an electronic transition that is optically thick to stimulated emission. Mesospheric metals have insufficient column density for amplified spontaneous emission, but atomic oxygen and nitrogen are potential candidates. They could potentially be excited by a high-energy chirped femtosecond pulsed laser, making visible-wavelength transitions accessible. Such lasers can also generate a white-light supercontinuum in the atmosphere. In addition to providing high intensity, the broadband emission from such a source could facilitate the sensing of the tilt component of atmospheric turbulence. (C) 2021 Optical Society of America

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据