4.6 Article

Hybrid metamaterial absorber for ultra-low and dual-broadband absorption

期刊

OPTICS EXPRESS
卷 29, 期 9, 页码 14078-14086

出版社

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/OE.423245

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0700201, 2017YFA0700202, 2017YFA0700203, 2018YFA0701904, 2020YFA0710100]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51672204, 51701146, 61722106, 61731010]
  3. Foundation of National Key Laboratory on Electromagnetic Environment Effects [614220504030617]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2019IB017, 205209016, WUT: 2020YB-032]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces a hybrid metamaterial absorber composed of graphene films and conventional magnetic absorbing materials, designed for wideband absorption performance at ultra-low frequencies. Experimental results validate the effectiveness of the design method, highlighting its lightweight and environmentally adaptable engineering value.
Developing high-efficiency microwave absorbers remains challenging in the broad-band range, particularly in the low-frequency range containing the L band and even lower. To overcome this challenge, a hybrid metamaterial absorber comprising a conventional magnetic absorbing material and a multi-layered meta-structure predesigned with graphene films is proposed to realize wideband absorption performance starting from ultra-low frequencies (0.79-20.9 GHz and 25.1-40.0 GHz). The high absorption ability of the proposed device originates from fundamental resonance modes and their coupling. The experimental results agree well with the simulated ones, proving the effectiveness of our design method. In addition, owing to the use of low-density polymethylacrylimide foam and graphene films with outstanding mechanical properties, our design is lightweight and environmentally adaptable, which reflects its engineering value. (C) 2021 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据