4.6 Article

Spatial and temporal super-resolution for fluorescence microscopy by a recurrent neural network

期刊

OPTICS EXPRESS
卷 29, 期 10, 页码 15747-15763

出版社

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/OE.423892

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Key Research and Development Projects of Shaanxi Province [2020ZDLGY01-03]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51975483, 62006195]
  3. Science, Technology and Innovation Commission of Shenzhen Municipality [JCYJ20180508151936092]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel spatial and temporal super-resolution framework based on a recurrent neural network is proposed, achieving excellent reconstruction results and improving resolution of fluorescence images. The performance can be enhanced, running time reduced, and robustness against interference can be maintained.
A novel spatial and temporal super-resolution (SR) framework based on a recurrent neural network (RNN) is demonstrated. In this work, we learn the complex yet useful features from the temporal data by taking advantage of structural characteristics of RNN and a skip connection. The usage of supervision mechanism is not only making full use of the intermediate output of each recurrent layer to recover the final output, but also alleviating vanishing/exploding gradients during the back-propagation. The proposed scheme achieves excellent reconstruction results, improving both the spatial and temporal resolution of fluorescence images including the simulated and real tubulin datasets. Besides, robustness against various critical metrics, such as the full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) and molecular density, can also be incorporated. In the validation, the performance can be increased by more than 20% for intensity profile, and 8% for FWHM, and the running time can be saved at least 40% compared with the classic Deep-STORM method, a high-performance net which is popularly used for comparison. (C) 2021 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据