4.6 Article

Imaging in turbid water based on a Hadamard single-pixel imaging system

期刊

OPTICS EXPRESS
卷 29, 期 8, 页码 12010-12023

出版社

Optica Publishing Group
DOI: 10.1364/OE.421937

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Science and Technology Projects of Fujian Province [2017FJSCZY02]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [20720180068]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61571377, 61771412, 61871336]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Underwater imaging is challenging due to noise and scattering in water. Conventional optical methods struggle with low sensitivity, geometric aberrations, and narrow detector spectra. Single-pixel imaging offers promise in poor visibility, but faces challenges in highly turbid water. The proposed Hadamard single-pixel imaging system shows superior performance in turbid water, with higher resolution and anti-scattering capabilities compared to existing SPI techniques.
Underwater imaging is a challenging task because of the large amounts of noise and the scattering nature of water. Conventional optical methods cannot realize clear imaging in underwater conditions owing to the limitations of low sensitivity, geometrical aberrations, and the narrow spectrum of photoelectric detectors. By contrast, single-pixel imaging (SPI) is a promising tool for imaging in poor-visibility environments. Nevertheless, this challenge is faced even when using traditional SPI methods in highly turbid underwater environments. In this work, we propose a Hadamard single-pixel imaging (HSI) system that outperforms other imaging modes in turbid water imaging. The effects of laser power, projection rate, and water turbidity on the final image quality are systematically investigated. Results reveal that compared with the state-of-the-art SPI techniques, the proposed HSI system is more promising for underwater imaging because of its high resolution and anti-scattering capabilities. (C) 2021 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据