4.6 Article

Optical tweezers study of membrane fluidity in small cell lung cancer cells

期刊

OPTICS EXPRESS
卷 29, 期 8, 页码 11976-11986

出版社

Optica Publishing Group
DOI: 10.1364/OE.420288

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31870759, 61535011]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WK9110000025]
  3. National Cancer Center Climbing Funds [NCC201812B036]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province [2008085MH288]
  5. New Coronavirus Infection Emergency Science and Technology Project
  6. Clinical Research Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [YD9110002010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrated that transfection of miR-92b-3p significantly increased invasiveness and membrane fluidity of SHP77 cells. By using optical tweezers and a newly developed physical model, the research laid the groundwork for a better understanding of cancer cell invasion and membrane mechanical characteristics.
The fluidity of the cell membrane is closely related to cancer metastasis/invasion. To test the relationship of membrane fluidity and invasiveness, we first demonstrated that transfection of small RNA miR-92b-3p can significantly increase invasiveness of the small cell lung cancer cell line SHP77. Then optical tweezers were used to measure membrane fluidity. This study employed continuous and step-like stretching methods to examine fluidity changes in SHP77 cell membranes before and after miR-92b-3p transfection. A newly developed physical model was used to derive the effective viscosity and static tension of the cell membrane from relaxation curves obtained via step-like stretching. Experiments showed that invasiveness and fluidity increased significantly after miR-92b-3p transfection. This study paved the way toward a better understanding of cancer cell invasion and membrane mechanical characteristics. (C) 2021 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据