4.7 Article

Development of thermal model for the determination of SLM process parameters

期刊

OPTICS AND LASER TECHNOLOGY
卷 137, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106825

关键词

Eigen-function expansion; Non-homogeneous heat equation; Laser power; Laser spot size; Powder bed

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A mathematical model was developed to determine process parameters in the manufacturing process of powder materials using the selective laser melting method, utilizing the Eigen-function expansion method for the first time. The developed model showed increased accuracy compared to other analytical models through numerical parametric studies.
In this study, a mathematical model is developed for determining the process parameters used in the manufacturing process of powder materials with selective laser melting method. Although the studies carried out to date cover detailed modeling studies including three-dimensional and time-dependent situations, obtaining quite different approaches from experimental results has led to the idea that a change should be made in the construction of the mathematical problem. Therefore, different from other studies and for the first time, the Eigen-function expansion method was used in the analytical solution of the selective laser melting thermal model. The developed mathematical model includes the steady-state solution with the appropriate boundary conditions of the 2-D non-homogeneous heat equation. The mathematical model was first solved analytically with the Eigen-function expansion method, and the function obtained as a result of the solution was introduced into the MATLAB software. The parametric study was performed numerically over laser power, laser spot size and powder bed thickness. With the developed model, the solution was converged in 30 s and 11.5% more accurate with respect to experimental results were obtained in width, 29% in depth and 3% in temperature as compared to other analytical models exist in the literature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据