4.6 Article

Increase of SRG modulation depth in azopolymers-nanoparticles hybrid materials

期刊

OPTICAL MATERIALS
卷 115, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.optmat.2021.111015

关键词

Azopolymers; Metallic nanoparticles; Hybrid materials; Surface relief gratings

资金

  1. University of Buenos Aires [UBACyT 20020170100381BA, 20020170100564BA]
  2. National Agency for the Promotion of Research, Technological Development and Innovation [PICT-2018-04235, PICT 2017-2362]
  3. National Council for Scientific and Technical Research [PUE-IFIR-RD 1691/16, 11220150100475CO]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thin films of azopolymer-nanoparticles hybrid materials were fabricated with different concentrations of Ag and AgAu nanoparticles, resulting in higher modulations and diffraction efficiency compared to films without nanoparticles. The increase in efficiency was explained by the increase in free volume available for photoisomerization with certain concentrations of nanoparticles. The dependence of diffraction efficiency on concentration was directly related to changes in modulation depth, with maximum efficiency increasing over two times when doped with nanoparticles.
Thin films of azopolymer-nanoparticles hybrid materials were fabricated with poly[1-[4-(3-carboxy-4hydroxyphenylazo) benzenesulfonamido]-1,2-ethanediyl] (PAZO) and different concentrations of Ag and AgAu nanoparticles (NPs). By illuminating the films with polarized interference patterns, surface relief gratings (SRGs) were recorded. It was found that for some concentrations of NPs their modulations and diffraction efficiency were higher than the obtained for PAZO films without NPs. The effect was mainly explained by the increase of the free volume available for the photoisomerization for certain concentrations of NPs. The dependence of the diffraction efficiency on concentration was directly related to changes in modulation depth. When doping with NPs, the maximum efficiency increases more than two times the efficiency without NPs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据