4.5 Article

Hostile attributions in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia contribute to poor social functioning

期刊

ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA
卷 131, 期 6, 页码 472-482

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/acps.12399

关键词

social cognition; theory of mind; emotion recognition; subthreshold symptoms; bipolar disorder; schizophrenia

资金

  1. Beatriu de Pinos granted by the Agency for Management of University and Research Grants (AGAUR)
  2. agency of the Secretariat of Universities and Research under the Department of Economy and Knowledge of the Catalan Government
  3. Marie Curie-COFUND actions of the Seventh Framework Programme of Research and Technological Development of the European Union

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectiveTo compare the profile of attributional style of a group of out-patients with bipolar disorder (BD) and schizophrenia (SZ), and a group of healthy controls - along with other social cognition domains - such as emotion recognition and theory of mind (ToM). MethodA total of 46 out-patients diagnosed with BD, 49 with SZ, and 50 healthy controls were assessed in attributional style (Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire), facial emotion recognition (FEIT, FEDT, ER-40), and ToM (Hinting Task). Symptomatology, clinical variables and global functioning were also collected. ResultsBoth groups with SZ and BD showed hostile social cognitive biases, compared with the control group. Patients with BD also showed a capacity for emotional recognition similar to those with SZ and worse than control subjects. In contrast, patients with SZ showed poorer ToM. Subthreshold depressive symptoms and an attributional style toward hostility appeared as the factors with a strongest association to global functioning in BD. In SZ, PANSS score and a tendency to aggressiveness were the most relevant factors. ConclusionAttributional style (along with other domains of social cognition) is altered in out-patients with BD and SZ. The presence of residual symptoms and a hostile social cognitive bias may contribute to the functional impairment of both groups.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据