4.8 Article

The emerging determinants of replication fork stability

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 49, 期 13, 页码 7224-7238

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab344

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [NIH R01ES026184]
  2. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [NIH R01GM134681]
  3. St. Baldrick's Foundation
  4. Pennsylvania State University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Replication fork reversal is a universal response to replication stress, but reversed forks are susceptible to nucleolytic digestion and rely on specific mechanisms for protection. The BRCA pathway plays a crucial role in maintaining fork stability, and its deficiency leads to degradation of reversed forks, genome instability, and chemosensitivity.
A universal response to replication stress is replication fork reversal, where the nascent complementary DNA strands are annealed to form a protective four-way junction allowing forks to avert DNA damage while replication stress is resolved. However, reversed forks are in turn susceptible to nucleolytic digestion of the regressed nascent DNA arms and rely on dedicated mechanisms to protect their integrity. The most well studied fork protection mechanism involves the BRCA pathway and its ability to catalyze RAD51 nucleofilament formation on the reversed arms of stalled replication forks. Importantly, the inability to prevent the degradation of reversed forks has emerged as a hallmark of BRCA deficiency and underlies genome instability and chemosensitivity in BRCA-deficient cells. In the past decade, multiple factors underlying fork stability have been discovered. These factors either cooperate with the BRCA pathway, operate independently from it to augment fork stability in its absence, or act as enablers of fork degradation. In this review, we examine these novel determinants of fork stability, explore the emergent conceptual underpinnings underlying fork protection, as well as the impact of fork protection on cellular viability and cancer therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据