4.8 Article

Histone deacetylases control lysine acetylation of ribosomal proteins in rice

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 49, 期 8, 页码 4613-4628

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab244

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31730049, 32070563]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFD0100802]
  3. Huazhong Agricultural University Scientific & Technological Self-innovation Foundation [2016RC003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study revealed Kac as a functional posttranslational modification of r-proteins, controlled by histone deacetylases, impacting protein stability and translational regulation.
Lysine acetylation (Kac) is well known to occur in histones for chromatin function and epigenetic regulation. In addition to histones, Kac is also detected in a large number of proteinswith diverse biological functions. However, Kac function and regulatory mechanism for most proteins are unclear. In this work, we studied mutation effects of rice genes encoding cytoplasm-localized histone deacetylases (HDAC) on protein acetylome and found that the HDAC protein HDA714 was a major deacetylase of the rice non-histone proteins including many ribosomal proteins (r-proteins) and translation factors that were extensively acetylated. HDA714 loss-of-functionmutations increased Kac levels but reduced abundance of r-proteins. In vitro andin vivo experiments showed that HDA714 interacted with r-proteins and reduced their Kac. Substitutions of lysine by arginine (depleting Kac) in several r-proteins enhance, while mutations of lysine to glutamine (mimicking Kac) decrease their stability in transient expression system. Ribo-seq analysis revealed that the hda714 mutations resulted in increased ribosome stalling frequency. Collectively, the results uncover Kac as a functional posttranslational modification of r-proteins which is controlled by histone deacetylases, extending the role of Kac in gene expression to protein translational regulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据