4.4 Article

Region-specific changes in aquaporin 4 induced by hyperglycemia underlie the differences in cell swelling in the cortex and striatum after cerebral ischemia-reperfusion

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 754, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2021.135885

关键词

Ischemic stroke; Diabetes; Cortex; Striatum; Aquaporin 4; Astrocyte

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31960177, 31780280]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Ningxia [XT2017027]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Brain edema is a major cause of death in patients who suffer an ischemic stroke. Diabetes aggravates brain edema after cerebral ischemia-reperfusion, with different effects observed in various brain regions. Hyperglycemia can significantly impact the distribution of aquaporin 4 and increase the number of swelling cells in the striatal penumbra compared to the cortical penumbra.
Brain edema is a major cause of death in patients who suffer an ischemic stroke. Diabetes has been shown to aggravate brain edema after cerebral ischemia-reperfusion, but few studies have focused on the heterogeneity of this response across different brain regions. Aquaporin 4 plays an important role in the formation and regression of brain edema. Here, we report that hyperglycemia mainly affects the continuity of aquaporin 4 distribution around blood vessels in the cortical penumbra after ischemia-reperfusion; however, in the striatal penumbra, in addition to affecting the continuity of distribution, it also substantially affects the fluorescence intensity and the polarity distribution in astrocytes. Accordingly, hyperglycemia induces a more significant increase in the number of swelling cells in the striatal penumbra than in the cortical penumbra. These results can improve our under-standing of the mechanism underlying the effects of diabetes in cerebral ischemic injury and provide a theo-retical foundation for identification of appropriate therapeutic modalities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据