4.5 Article

Caffeine, a natural methylxanthine nutraceutical, exerts dopaminergic neuroprotection

期刊

NEUROCHEMISTRY INTERNATIONAL
卷 148, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuint.2021.105066

关键词

Caffeine; Adenosine A(2A) receptor; Dopamine; Parkinson's disease; Neuroprotection; Neurodegenerative disease

资金

  1. Auburn University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Parkinson's disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder affecting over 10 million people worldwide, with oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction playing key roles in its progression. Studies suggest that caffeine may improve neurological function in PD patients and potentially prevent disease progression.
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that affects more than 10 million people worldwide. Oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction play a significant role in altering the homeostasis of energy production and free radical generation. Current PD therapies are focused on reducing the cardinal symptoms rather than preventing disease progression in the patients. Adenosine A(2A) receptor (A(2A) R) antagonist (Istradephylline) combined with levodopa shows a promising therapy for PD. In animal studies, caffeine administration showed to improve motor functions and neuroprotective effect in the neurons. Caffeine is probably the most extensively used psychoactive substance. In this current study, we investigated the neuroprotective effect of caffeine against 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-induced neurodegeneration. Here, we demonstrate that caffeine improves behavioral and neurotransmitter recovery against MPTP-induced toxicity. Caffeine restores endogenous antioxidant levels and suppresses neuroinflammation. Our finding suggests that the blockage of A(2A)R is a promising disease-modifying therapy for PD. Target engagement strategies could be more beneficial in preventing disease progression rather than symptomatic reliefs in PD patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据