4.6 Article

Residual attention convolutional autoencoder for feature learning and fault detection in nonlinear industrial processes

期刊

NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS
卷 33, 期 19, 页码 12737-12753

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-021-05919-6

关键词

Nonlinear process; Deep learning; Fault detection; Convolutional autoencoder

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71777173]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper introduces a new deep neural network RACAE for process monitoring, significantly improving monitoring performance in nonlinear processes. A new process monitoring model is developed with two statistics for fault detection, and the effectiveness of this method is evaluated through numerical cases and benchmark processes.
Deep learning has been successfully applied in process monitoring in recent years due to its powerful feature extraction. However, these monitoring methods are difficult to extract intrinsic representations of the process data in complex nonlinear processes. A new deep neural network, residual attention convolutional autoencoder (RACAE) is proposed for process monitoring. The unsupervised learning method of RACAE can extract representative features from high-dimensional data, which can significantly improve process monitoring performance in nonlinear processes. RACAE effectively integrates convolution calculation with an autoencoder to perform effective feature extraction of multivariate data. Moreover, residual attention block is embedded in the autoencoder to select these key features and then reduce the feature dimension for detector. A new process monitoring model is proposed and two kinds of statistics are developed for fault detection. The effectiveness of RACAE in fault detection is evaluated through a numerical case and two benchmark processes. The convolutional autoencoder based on residual attention provides a new approach for feature learning and process monitoring of complex processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据