4.6 Article

Dynamic Cat Swarm Optimization algorithm for backboard wiring problem

期刊

NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS
卷 33, 期 20, 页码 13981-13997

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-021-06041-3

关键词

Dynamic Cat Swarm Optimization; Cat Swarm Optimization; Exploration and exploitation phases; Metaheuristics; Optimization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces a powerful swarm intelligence optimization algorithm named Dynamic Cat Swarm Optimization, which addresses the issue of premature convergence by modifying the existing Cat Swarm Optimization algorithm. Experimental results demonstrate the algorithm's outperformance compared to several well-known algorithms, further confirmed through statistical methods and graphs.
This paper presents a powerful swarm intelligence metaheuristic optimization algorithm called Dynamic Cat Swarm Optimization. The formulation is through modifying the existing Cat Swarm Optimization Algorithm. The original Cat Swarm Optimization suffers from the shortcoming of premature convergence, which is the possibility of entrapment in local optima which usually happens due to the off balance between exploration and exploitation phases. Therefore, the proposed algorithm suggests a new method to provide a proper balance between these phases by modifying the selection scheme and the seeking mode of the algorithm. To evaluate the performance of the proposed algorithm, 23 classical test functions, 10 modern test functions (CEC 2019) and a real-world scenario are used. In addition, the dimension-wise diversity metric is used to measure the percentage of the exploration and exploitation phases. The optimization results show the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm, which ranks first compared to several well-known algorithms available in the literature. Furthermore, statistical methods and graphs are also used to further confirm the outperformance of the algorithm. Finally, the conclusion and future directions to further improve the algorithm are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据