4.7 Review

Clinical cancer genomic profiling

期刊

NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS
卷 22, 期 8, 页码 483-501

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41576-021-00338-8

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Profiling tumors by next-generation sequencing has the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy, assess heritable cancer risk, and guide treatment selection. Through integrative analyses of tumor and germline variants, as well as identifying mutational signatures that influence therapy response, the clinical utility of cancer genomic profiling is being enhanced. Rapid technological innovation and reduced sequencing costs have enabled the profiling of hundreds of cancer-associated genes as part of routine cancer care.
Profiling tumours by next-generation sequencing can improve diagnostic accuracy, assess for heritable cancer risk and guide treatment selection. The authors review efforts to enhance the clinical utility of cancer genomic profiling through integrative analyses of tumour and germline variants, as well as by characterizing allelic context and mutational signatures that influence therapy response. Technological innovation and rapid reduction in sequencing costs have enabled the genomic profiling of hundreds of cancer-associated genes as a component of routine cancer care. Tumour genomic profiling can refine cancer subtype classification, identify which patients are most likely to benefit from systemic therapies and screen for germline variants that influence heritable cancer risk. Here, we discuss ongoing efforts to enhance the clinical utility of tumour genomic profiling by integrating tumour and germline analyses, characterizing allelic context and identifying mutational signatures that influence therapy response. We also discuss the potential clinical utility of more comprehensive whole-genome and whole-transcriptome sequencing and ultra-sensitive cell-free DNA profiling platforms, which allow for minimally invasive, serial analyses of tumour-derived DNA in blood.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据