4.5 Article

A nutrient profiling system for the (re)formulation of a global food and beverage portfolio

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 56, 期 3, 页码 1105-1122

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00394-016-1161-9

关键词

Nutrition; Foods; Nutrient profiling; Reformulation

资金

  1. Nestec Ltd, a wholly owned affiliate of Nestle S.A.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose To describe the Nestle Nutritional Profiling System (NNPS) developed to guide the reformulation of Nestle products, and the results of its application in the USA and France. Design The NNPS is a category-specific system that calculates nutrient targets per serving as consumed, based on age-adjusted dietary guidelines. Products are aggregated into 32 food categories. The NNPS ensures that excessive amounts of nutrients to limit cannot be compensated for by adding nutrients to encourage. A study was conducted to measure changes in nutrient profiles of the most widely purchased Nestle products from eight food categories (n = 99) in the USA and France. A comparison was made between the 2009-2010 and 2014-2015 products. Results The application of the NNPS between 2009-2010 and 2014-2015 was associated with an overall downwards trend for all nutrients to limit. Sodium and total sugars contents were reduced by up to 22 and 31 %, respectively. Saturated Fatty Acids and total fat reductions were less homogeneous across categories, with children products having larger reductions. Energy per serving was reduced by < 10 % in most categories, while serving sizes remained unchanged. Conclusions The NNPS sets feasible and yet challenging targets for public health-oriented reformulation of a varied product portfolio; its application was associated with improved nutrient density in eight major food categories in the USA and France. Confirmatory analyses are needed in other countries and food categories; the impact of such a large-scale reformulation on dietary intake and health remains to be investigated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据