4.8 Article

Altered perivascular fibroblast activity precedes ALS disease onset

期刊

NATURE MEDICINE
卷 27, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-021-01295-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. MRC [UKDRI-5008] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study suggests that increased activity of perivascular fibroblast cells and vascular remodeling early in ALS pathogenesis can predict patient survival time. Elevated levels of SPP1 in plasma at disease diagnosis are a stronger predictor of shorter survival in ALS patients than established risk factors.
Apart from well-defined factors in neuronal cells(1), only a few reports consider that the variability of sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) progression can depend on less-defined contributions from glia(2,3) and blood vessels(4). In this study we use an expression-weighted cell-type enrichment method to infer cell activity in spinal cord samples from patients with sporadic ALS and mouse models of this disease. Here we report that patients with sporadic ALS present cell activity patterns consistent with two mouse models in which enrichments of vascular cell genes preceded microglial response. Notably, during the presymptomatic stage, perivascular fibroblast cells showed the strongest gene enrichments, and their marker proteins SPP1 and COL6A1 accumulated in enlarged perivascular spaces in patients with sporadic ALS. Moreover, in plasma of 574 patients with ALS from four independent cohorts, increased levels of SPP1 at disease diagnosis repeatedly predicted shorter survival with stronger effect than the established risk factors of bulbar onset or neurofilament levels in cerebrospinal fluid. We propose that the activity of the recently discovered perivascular fibroblast can predict survival of patients with ALS and provide a new conceptual framework to re-evaluate definitions of ALS etiology. Increased perivascular fibroblast activity and vascular remodeling occurs early in ALS pathogenesis and can predict patient survival time

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据