4.8 Article

Distinct dynamics and functions of H2AK119ub1 and H3K27me3 in mouse preimplantation embryos

期刊

NATURE GENETICS
卷 53, 期 4, 页码 551-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41588-021-00821-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R01HD092465]
  2. HHMI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In mouse preimplantation embryos, H2AK119ub1 and H3K27me3 have distinct genome-wide dynamics. Loss of H2AK119ub1 results in premature activation of developmental genes, while loss of H3K27me3 does not.
Polycomb repressive complexes 1 and 2 (PRC1/2) maintain transcriptional silencing of developmental genes largely by catalyzing the formation of mono-ubiquitinated histone H2A at lysine 119 (H2AK119ub1) and trimethylated histone H3 at lysine 27 (H3K27me3), respectively. How Polycomb domains are reprogrammed during mammalian preimplantation development remains largely unclear. Here we show that, although H2AK119ub1 and H3K27me3 are highly colocalized in gametes, they undergo differential reprogramming dynamics following fertilization. H3K27me3 maintains thousands of maternally biased domains until the blastocyst stage, whereas maternally biased H2AK119ub1 distribution in zygotes is largely equalized at the two-cell stage. Notably, while maternal PRC2 depletion has a limited effect on global H2AK119ub1 in early embryos, it disrupts allelic H2AK119ub1 at H3K27me3 imprinting loci including Xist. By contrast, acute H2AK119ub1 depletion in zygotes does not affect H3K27me3 imprinting maintenance, at least by the four-cell stage. Importantly, loss of H2AK119ub1, but not H3K27me3, causes premature activation of developmental genes during zygotic genome activation (ZGA) and subsequent embryonic arrest. Thus, our study reveals distinct dynamics and functions of H3K27me3 and H2AK119ub1 in mouse preimplantation embryos. H2AK119ub1 and H3K27me3 have different genome-wide dynamics in mouse preimplantation embryos. Loss of H2AK119ub1, but not H3K27me3, causes premature activation of developmental genes during zygotic genome activation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据