4.8 Article

A unified haplotype-based method for accurate and comprehensive variant calling

期刊

NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 39, 期 7, 页码 885-892

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41587-021-00861-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust Genomic Medicine and Statistics PhD Program [203735/Z/16/Z]
  2. Wellcome Trust Core Award [203141/Z/16/Z]
  3. NIHR Oxford BRC
  4. Wellcome Trust [203735/Z/16/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Octopus is a variant caller that uses a polymorphic Bayesian genotyping model capable of modeling different experimental designs within a unified haplotype-aware framework. It accurately calls germline variants in individuals, including low-frequency somatic variations, while producing fewer false positives compared to other methods. Octopus also outputs realigned evidence BAM files to assist with validation and interpretation.
Almost all haplotype-based variant callers were designed specifically for detecting common germline variation in diploid populations, and give suboptimal results in other scenarios. Here we present Octopus, a variant caller that uses a polymorphic Bayesian genotyping model capable of modeling sequencing data from a range of experimental designs within a unified haplotype-aware framework. Octopus combines sequencing reads and prior information to phase-called genotypes of arbitrary ploidy, including those with somatic mutations. We show that Octopus accurately calls germline variants in individuals, including single nucleotide variants, indels and small complex replacements such as microinversions. Using a synthetic tumor data set derived from clean sequencing data from a sample with known germline haplotypes and observed mutations in a large cohort of tumor samples, we show that Octopus is more sensitive to low-frequency somatic variation, yet calls considerably fewer false positives than other methods. Octopus also outputs realigned evidence BAM files to aid validation and interpretation. Octopus detects germline and somatic variants with high sensitivity and accuracy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据