4.8 Article

SARS-CoV-2 uses a multipronged strategy to impede host protein synthesis

期刊

NATURE
卷 594, 期 7862, 页码 240-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03610-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. Weizmann Corona Response Fund
  2. European Research Council [CoG-2019-864012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reveals that SARS-CoV-2 infection leads to a global reduction in translation and accelerated degradation of cytosolic cellular mRNAs. It also impairs the translation of transcripts induced in response to infection, probably mediated by inhibition of nuclear mRNA export.
The coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 is the cause of the ongoing pandemic of COVID-19(1). Coronaviruses have developed a variety of mechanisms to repress host mRNA translation to allow the translation of viral mRNA, and concomitantly block the cellular innate immune response(2,3). Although several different proteins of SARS-CoV-2 have previously been implicated in shutting off host expression(4-7), a comprehensive picture of the effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on cellular gene expression is lacking. Here we combine RNA sequencing, ribosome profiling and metabolic labelling of newly synthesized RNA to comprehensively define the mechanisms that are used by SARS-CoV-2 to shut off cellular protein synthesis. We show that infection leads to a global reduction in translation, but that viral transcripts are not preferentially translated. Instead, we find that infection leads to the accelerated degradation of cytosolic cellular mRNAs, which facilitates viral takeover of the mRNA pool in infected cells. We reveal that the translation of transcripts that are induced in response to infection (including innate immune genes) is impaired. We demonstrate this impairment is probably mediated by inhibition of nuclear mRNA export, which prevents newly transcribed cellular mRNA from accessing ribosomes. Overall, our results uncover a multipronged strategy that is used by SARS-CoV-2 to take over the translation machinery and to suppress host defences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据