4.8 Article

Hippocampal AMPA receptor assemblies and mechanism of allosteric inhibition

期刊

NATURE
卷 594, 期 7863, 页码 448-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03540-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [U24GM129547]
  2. EMSL, a DOE Office of Science User Facility - Office of Biological and Environmental Research [grid.436923.9]
  3. NIGMS [R35GM122569]
  4. NINDS [R01NS038631]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AMPA receptors play a crucial role in mediating signal transduction in the hippocampal neuronal circuits, and their function is regulated by auxiliary protein subunits that associate with the receptors in a specific manner. Different combinations of AMPA receptor auxiliary subunits may have diverse impacts on the receptor function.
AMPA-selective glutamate receptors mediate the transduction of signals between the neuronal circuits of the hippocampus(1). The trafficking, localization, kinetics and pharmacology of AMPA receptors are tuned by an ensemble of auxiliary protein subunits, which are integral membrane proteins that associate with the receptor to yield bona fide receptor signalling complexes(2). Thus far, extensive studies of recombinant AMPA receptor-auxiliary subunit complexes using engineered protein constructs have not been able to faithfully elucidate the molecular architecture of hippocampal AMPA receptor complexes. Here we obtain mouse hippocampal, calcium-impermeable AMPA receptor complexes using immunoaffinity purification and use single-molecule fluorescence and cryo-electron microscopy experiments to elucidate three major AMPA receptor-auxiliary subunit complexes. The GluA1-GluA2, GluA1-GluA2-GluA3 and GluA2-GluA3 receptors are the predominant assemblies, with the auxiliary subunits TARP-gamma 8 and CNIH2-SynDIG4 non-stochastically positioned at the B'/D' and A'/C' positions, respectively. We further demonstrate how the receptor-TARP-gamma 8 stoichiometry explains the mechanism of and submaximal inhibition by a clinically relevant, brain-region-specific allosteric inhibitor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据