4.4 Article

Dihydrostilbene glycosides from Camellia sinensis var. assamica and their cytotoxic activity

期刊

NATURAL PRODUCT RESEARCH
卷 36, 期 15, 页码 3931-3937

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14786419.2021.1900844

关键词

Camellia sinensis var; assamica; dihydrostilbene; cytotoxic activity

资金

  1. Vietnam National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED) [104.01-2018.09]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three undescribed dihydrostilbene glycosides and seven known compounds were isolated from the methanol extract of Camellia sinensis var. assamica leaves. All compounds exhibited cytotoxic activity against human oral cancer and human breast cancer cell lines. Compound 10 showed significant cytotoxic activity compared to the positive control capecitabine.
Three undescribed dihydrostilbene glycosides, 3,5-dihydroxyldihydrostilbene 4 '-O-[6 ''-O-(4 '''-hydroxylbenzoyl)]-beta-D-glucopyranoside (1), 3,5-dihydroxyldihydrostilbene 4 '-O-(6 ''-O-galloyl)-beta-D-glucopyranoside (2), and 3,5-dihydroxyldihydrostilbene 4 '-O-[6 ''-O-(3 ''',4 '''-dimethoxyl)galloyl]-beta-D-glucopyranoside (3), and seven known compounds, kaempferol 3-O-beta-D-glucopyranoside (4), isoquercitrin (5), kaempferol 3-O-alpha-L-rhamnoside (6), quercitrin (7), (6S,9R)-roseoside (8), (-)-epicatechin 3-O-gallate (9), and (-)-epigallocatechin 3-O-gallate (10) have been isolated from the methanol extract of the leaves of Camellia sinensis var. assamica (J.W.Mast.) Kitam. (synnonym of Camellia assamica (Mast.) H.T.Chang) (Theaceae). Their structures were elucidated by spectroscopic methods (1 D-, 2 D-NMR) and mass spectra. All compounds were evaluated for cytotoxic activity against human oral cancer (CAL27) and human breast cancer (MDAMB231) cell lines. Compound 10 showed significant cytotoxic activity against CAL27 and MDAMB231 cell lines with IC50 values of 9.78 +/- 0.25 and 3.27 +/- 0.18 mu M, respectively, compared to those of positive control, capecitabine (IC50 values of 8.20 +/- 0.75 and 5.20 +/- 0.89 mu M).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据