4.6 Article

Ultra-fast and facile preparation of uniform sulfur/graphene composites with microwave for lithium-sulfur batteries

期刊

NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 32, 期 28, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6528/abf4a8

关键词

microwave; graphene; practical application; lithium-sulfur batteries

资金

  1. Key Research Program of Shaanxi Province [2017ZDXM-GY-035]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC-51707151, 51772241]
  3. Independent Research Project of National Key Laboratory of Electrical Insulation and Power Equipment [EIPE19111]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20190222]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An ultra-fast and facile method using microwave assistance has been proposed to prepare sulfur/graphene composites for lithium-sulfur batteries. This method allows sulfur to quickly and uniformly deposit on the surface of graphene within just 30 seconds, producing nano-sized sulfur particles. The lithium-sulfur batteries made with these composites exhibit good cycling life with a capacity of 503.5 mAh g(-1) at 0.2 C, making practical application possible.
Lithium-sulfur batteries are one of the most promising energy storage systems due to their high energy density. Many efforts have been made to improve the electrochemical performance of lithium-sulfur batteries. However, the complex and time-consuming preparation process hinders their practical application. In this work, an ultra-fast and facile method has been proposed to prepare the sulfur/graphene composites in a simplified and time-saving preparation process with the assistance of microwave. Microwave is introduced to help sulfur fleetly deposit uniformly on the surface of graphene within just 30 s. Nano-sized sulfur within 30 nm is generated in this ultra-fast process. Lithium-sulfur batteries with as-prepared sulfur/graphene composites exhibit good cycling life with a capacity of 503.5 mAh g(-1) at 0.2 C. This method makes it possible for lithium-sulfur batteries to be practical.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据