4.8 Article

Voltage-Modulated Structure Stress for Enhanced Electrochemcial Performances: The Case of μ-Sn in Sodium-Ion Batteries

期刊

NANO LETTERS
卷 21, 期 8, 页码 3588-3595

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c00489

关键词

Sodium-ion batteries; Alloy-type anodes; Tin; Structure stress; Phase transition

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [21971146, 61527809]
  2. Taishan Scholarship in Shandong Provinces [ts201511004]
  3. Science, Technology and Innovation Commission of Shenzhen Municipality [JCYJ20180305164424922]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds of Shandong University [2018JC023]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By controlling the cutoff voltages to eliminate the Sn/NaSn3 phase transition, the cycle life of microsized Sn in sodium ion batteries has been significantly extended, while maintaining a high specific capacity. This simple and effective approach allows for outstanding performance without the need for complicated preparation, expensive reagents, or laborious processing.
Alloy-type anodes in alkaline ion batteries have to face the challenges of huge volume change and giant structure strain/stress upon cycling. Here, reducing the structure stress for advanced performances by voltage regulation is demonstrated by using microsized Sn (mu-Sn) for sodium ion batteries as a model. Density functional theory and finite element analysis indicate that Sn/NaSn3 is the crucial phase transition highly responsible for inducing surface cracks, particle aggregations, and cell failures. Eliminating this phase transition by the control of cutoff voltages successfully extends the cycle life of mu-Sn to 2500 cycles at 2 A g(-1), much longer than similar to 40 cycles in a regular voltage window. The specific capacity is still retained at similar to 455 mAh g(-1), leading to a capacity decay of only similar to 0.0088% per cycle. The results provide a simple way to achieve the outstanding performances without complicated preparation, expensive reagents, and laborious processing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据