4.3 Article

A randomized study of natalizumab dosing regimens for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

期刊

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL
卷 27, 期 14, 页码 2240-2253

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/13524585211003020

关键词

Dosing interval; MRI; multiple sclerosis; natalizumab; neurology; relapses

资金

  1. Biogen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to examine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of natalizumab administered via various regimens in RRMS patients. The results showed that natalizumab 300 mg subcutaneous Q4W was comparable to 300 mg intravenous Q4W dosing with respect to efficacy, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, and safety.
Background: REFINE was an exploratory, dose- and frequency-blinded, prospective, randomized, dose-ranging study in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients. Objective: To examine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of natalizumab administered via various regimens in RRMS patients. Methods: Clinically stable RRMS patients previously treated with 300 mg natalizumab intravenously for > 12 months were randomized to one of six natalizumab regimens over 60 weeks: 300 mg administered intravenously or subcutaneously every 4 weeks (Q4W), 300 mg intravenously or subcutaneously every 12 weeks (Q12W), or 150 mg intravenously or subcutaneously Q12W. The primary endpoint was the mean cumulative number of combined unique active magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions at week 60. Results: In total, 290 patients were enrolled. All Q12W dosing arms were associated with increased clinical and MRI disease activity and closed early; > 39.5% of patients in each Q12W arm met rescue criteria. In the 300 mg intravenous and subcutaneous Q4 W arms, the mean cumulative number of combined unique active MRI lesions was 0.23 and 0.02, respectively; annualized relapse rates were 0.07 and 0.08, respectively; and trough natalizumab serum levels and alpha 4-integrin saturation were comparable. Conclusion: Natalizumab 300 mg subcutaneous Q4W was comparable to 300 mg intravenous Q4W dosing with respect to efficacy, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, and safety.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据