4.6 Article

Chinese Propolis Suppressed Pancreatic Cancer Panc-1 Cells Proliferation and Migration via Hippo-YAP Pathway

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 26, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules26092803

关键词

Chinese propolis; pancreatic cancer; apoptosis; cell cycle arrest; migration; Hippo-YAP pathway

资金

  1. earmarked fund for Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System from the Ministry of Agriculture of China [CARS-44]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrated that Chinese propolis has a significant anticancer effect on pancreatic cancer cells Panc-1 by inducing apoptosis, inhibiting cell migration, and activating the Hippo pathway to suppress tumor growth.
Pancreatic cancer is one of the most malignant cancers with high mortality. Therefore, it is of great urgency to develop new agents that could improve the prognosis of Pancreatic cancer patients. Chinese propolis (CP), a flavonoid-rich beehive product, has been reported to have an anticancer effect. In this study, we applied CP to the human Pancreatic cancer cell line Panc-1 to verify its impact on tumor development. CP induced apoptosis in Panc-1 cells from 12.5 mu g/mL in a time- and dose-dependent manner with an IC50 value of approximately 50 mu g/mL. Apoptosis rate induced by CP was examined by Annexing FITC/PI assay. We found that 48 h treatment with 50 mu g/mL CP resulted in 34.25 +/- 3.81% apoptotic cells, as compared to 9.13 +/- 1.76% in the control group. We further discovered that the Panc-1 cells tended to be arrested at G2/M phase after CP treatment, which is considered to contribute to the anti-proliferation effect of CP. Furthermore, our results demonstrated that CP suppressed Panc-1 cell migration by regulating epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Interestingly, the Hippo pathway was activated in Panc-1 cells after CP treatment, serving as a mechanism for the anti-pancreatic cancer effect of CP. These findings provide a possibility of beehive products as an alternative treatment for pancreatic cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据