4.6 Article

Needle Trap Device-GC-MS for Characterization of Lung Diseases Based on Breath VOC Profiles

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 26, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules26061789

关键词

VOCs; NTD-GC-MS; breath; lung cancer; COPD; asthma; biomarkers

资金

  1. National Centre for Research and Development (Warsaw, Poland) [POLTUR2/4/2018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study quantified 29 VOCs in breath samples from lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and asthma patients, as well as investigated global VOC profiles. Results showed that VOCs in breath samples could serve as potential biomarkers of diseases, assisting in disease discrimination and classification.
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) have been assessed in breath samples as possible indicators of diseases. The present study aimed to quantify 29 VOCs (previously reported as potential biomarkers of lung diseases) in breath samples collected from controls and individuals with lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma. Besides that, global VOC profiles were investigated. A needle trap device (NTD) was used as pre-concentration technique, associated to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis. Univariate and multivariate approaches were applied to assess VOC distributions according to the studied diseases. Limits of quantitation ranged from 0.003 to 6.21 ppbv and calculated relative standard deviations did not exceed 10%. At least 15 of the quantified targets presented themselves as discriminating features. A random forest (RF) method was performed in order to classify enrolled conditions according to VOCs' latent patterns, considering VOCs responses in global profiles. The developed model was based on 12 discriminating features and provided overall balanced accuracy of 85.7%. Ultimately, multinomial logistic regression (MLR) analysis was conducted using the concentration of the nine most discriminative targets (2-propanol, 3-methylpentane, (E)-ocimene, limonene, m-cymene, benzonitrile, undecane, terpineol, phenol) as input and provided an average overall accuracy of 95.5% for multiclass prediction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据