4.6 Article

Comprehensive Investigation on Ginsenosides in Different Parts of a Garden-Cultivated Ginseng Root and Rhizome

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 26, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules26061696

关键词

cultivated ginseng root; ginsenosides; UHPLC-Q-TOF; MS; UHPLC-CAD; fibrous root

资金

  1. National Science and Technology Major Project [2017ZX09 301072]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [82074008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The comprehensive analysis on the ginsenosides in different parts of ginseng root is scarce. Fibrous roots showed rich ingredients and high ginsenosides contents, which should be further utilized. The differences among these parts were the compositions and relative contents of ginsenosides.
Background: Ginseng is widely used as herb or food. Different parts of ginseng have diverse usages. However, the comprehensive analysis on the ginsenosides in different parts of ginseng root is scarce. Methods: An ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UHPLC-Q-TOF/MS) combined with UNIFI informatics platform and ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-charged aerosol detection (UHPLC-CAD) were employed to evaluate the different parts of cultivated ginseng root. Results: 105 ginsenosides including 16 new compounds were identified or tentatively characterized. 22 potential chemical markers were identified, 20, 17, and 19 for main root (MR) and fibrous root (FR), main root (MR) and branch root (BR), and main root (MR) and rhizome (RH), respectively. The relative contents of Re, Rb-1, 20(R)-Rh-1, Rd, and Rf were highest in FR. The relative content of Rg(1) was highest in RH. The total relative content of pharmacopoeia indicators Rg(1), Re, and Rb-1 was highest in FR. Conclusion: The differences among these parts were the compositions and relative contents of ginsenosides. Under our research conditions, the peak area ratio of Rg(1) and Re could distinguish the MR and FR samples. Fibrous roots showed rich ingredients and high ginsenosides contents which should be further utilized.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据