4.6 Article

Biodegradable and Biocompatible Silatrane Polymers

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 26, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules26071893

关键词

biodegradable polymers; branched block copolymers; silatrane; amphiphilicity; surface activity; biological activity

资金

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [17-03-01089]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focused on synthesizing biodegradable and biocompatible amphiphilic polymers by modifying the peripheral hydroxyl groups of branched polyethers and polyesters with organosilicon substituents. The research investigated the impact of the ratio of hydrophilic to hydrophobic organosilicon structures on the biological activity of macromolecules, as well as the influence of polymer structure on critical micelle concentrations and aggregation stability of emulsions. Additionally, the study explored how polymer structures affected antifungal activity and seed germination stimulation.
In this study, new biodegradable and biocompatible amphiphilic polymers were obtained by modifying the peripheral hydroxyl groups of branched polyethers and polyesters with organosilicon substituents. The structures of the synthesized polymers were confirmed by NMR and GPC. Organosilicon moieties of the polymers were formed by silatranes and trimethylsilyl blocks and displayed hydrophilic and hydrophobic properties, respectively. The effect of the ratio of hydrophilic to hydrophobic organosilicon structures on the surface activity and biological activity of macromolecules was studied, together with the effect on these activities of the macromolecules' molecular weight and chemical structure. In particular, the critical micelle concentrations were determined, the effect of the structure of the polymers on their wetting with aqueous solutions on glass and parafilm was described, and the aggregation stability of emulsions was studied. Finally, the effect of the polymer structures on their antifungal activity and seed germination stimulation was examined.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据