4.5 Article

High avidity drives the interaction between the streptococcal C1 phage endolysin, PlyC, with the cell surface carbohydrates of Group A Streptococcus

期刊

MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY
卷 116, 期 2, 页码 397-415

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mmi.14719

关键词

antimicrobial resistance; avidity; bacteriophage; cell wall binding; endolysin; PlyC

资金

  1. Monash University
  2. RTP scholarship from the Australian Department of Education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study identified the polyrhamnose backbone of Group A streptococcal cell wall as the binding target of PlyC, and characterized the putative rhamnose binding groove of PlyC with critical residues. The interaction between PlyC and the cell wall may be a high avidity one rather than a high-affinity one, contributing to PlyC's remarkable lytic activity.
Endolysin enzymes from bacteriophage cause bacterial lysis by degrading the peptidoglycan cell wall. The streptococcal C1 phage endolysin PlyC, is the most potent endolysin described to date and can rapidly lyse group A, C, and E streptococci. PlyC is known to bind the Group A streptococcal cell wall, but the specific molecular target or the binding site within PlyC remain uncharacterized. Here we report for the first time, that the polyrhamnose backbone of the Group A streptococcal cell wall is the binding target of PlyC. We have also characterized the putative rhamnose binding groove of PlyC and found four key residues that were critical to either the folding or the cell wall binding action of PlyC. Based on our results, we suggest that the interaction between PlyC and the cell wall may not be a high-affinity interaction as previously proposed, but rather a high avidity one, allowing for PlyC's remarkable lytic activity. Resistance to our current antibiotics is reaching crisis levels and there is an urgent need to develop the antibacterial agents with new modes of action. A detailed understanding of this potent endolysin may facilitate future developments of PlyC as a tool against the rise of antibiotic resistance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据