4.8 Article

Balancing cohesin eviction and retention prevents aberrant chromosomal interactions, Polycomb-mediated repression, and X-inactivation

期刊

MOLECULAR CELL
卷 81, 期 9, 页码 1970-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.02.031

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [9R01HD097665-09]
  2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  3. American Cancer Society postdoctoral fellowship [PF17-010-01-CDD]
  4. Katherine L. and Steven C. Pinard Research Fund
  5. [1F31HD100109-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The balance of cohesin eviction and retention plays a crucial role in regulating chromosomal structure, gene silencing, and inter-chromosomal interactions. Cohesin loss disrupts the superstructure of the Xi chromosome, while forced cohesin retention compromises spreading of RNA-Polycomb complexes and attenuates Xi silencing.
Depletion of architectural factors globally alters chromatin structure but only modestly affects gene expression. We revisit the structure-function relationship using the inactive X chromosome (Xi) as a model. We investigate cohesin imbalances by forcing its depletion or retention using degron-tagged RAD21 (cohesin subunit) or WAPL (cohesin release factor). Cohesin loss disrupts the Xi superstructure, unveiling superloops between escapee genes with minimal effect on gene repression. By contrast, forced cohesin retention markedly affects Xi superstructure, compromises spreading of Xist RNA-Polycomb complexes, and attenuates Xi silencing. Effects are greatest at distal chromosomal ends, where looping contacts with the Xist locus are weakened. Surprisingly, cohesin loss creates an Xi superloop, and cohesin retention creates Xi megadomains on the active X chromosome. Across the genome, a proper cohesin balance protects against aberrant inter-chromosomal interactions and tempers Polycomb-mediated repression. We conclude that a balance of cohesin eviction and retention regulates X inactivation and inter-chromosomal interactions across the genome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据