4.5 Review

Review on the physical basis of wave-particle duality: Conceptual connection between quantum mechanics and the Maxwell theory

期刊

MODERN PHYSICS LETTERS B
卷 35, 期 13, 页码 -

出版社

WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S0217984921300040

关键词

Wave– particle duality; matter wave; quantum wave function; Maxwell theory; electron

资金

  1. Macro-Science Program, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology [DCC18SC01]
  2. Hong Kong RGC grant [RMGS20SC01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reviews a new theoretical framework to address the mystery of wave-particle duality in quantum mechanics, proposing that photons and electrons are quantized excitation waves of the vacuum represented by wave functions. It suggests that the quantum wave function truly represents a physical wave, with the wave packet appearing as a particle only in the macroscopic view.
A well-known mystery in quantum mechanics is wave-particle duality: Is an electron a point mass or a physical wave? What is the physical meaning of its wave function? About a hundred years ago, there was a famous debate between Bohr and Einstein on this topic. Their question is still open today. This paper reviews a new theoretical framework to address this problem. Here, it is hypothesized that both photons and electrons are quantized excitation waves of the vacuum, the physical properties of which can be modeled based on the Maxwell theory. Using the method of Helmholtz decomposition, one can show that the wave function of the particle is associated with an electric vector potential called Z, which plays the role of basic field for the excitation wave. Using this framework, the quantum wave equations can be derived based on a quantization of the Maxwell theory. This work suggests that, the quantum wave function truly represents a physical wave; the wave packet looks like a particle only in the macroscopic view. Because the vacuum excitation obeys the principle of all-or-none, the probability of detecting this particle is related to the wave function as suggested in the Copenhagen interpretation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据