4.7 Article

Development and experimental validation of a texture-based 3D liberation model

期刊

MINERALS ENGINEERING
卷 164, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2021.106828

关键词

Liberation modeling; X-ray microcomputed tomography; Ore texture

资金

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program as part of the MetalIntelligence network [722677]
  2. Academy of Finland RAMI Infrastructure grant scheme
  3. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [722677] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Predicting mineral liberation through a texture-based 3D liberation model calibrated using experimental data measured in 3D mu CT can explain around 84% of the variance in the experimental liberation data. The generated particle population can be used for particle-based process simulation.
Prediction of mineral liberation is one of the key steps in establishing a link between ore texture and its processing behavior. With the rapid development of X-ray Microcomputed Tomography (mu CT), the extension of liberation modeling into 3D realms becomes possible. Liberation modeling allows for the generation of particle population from 3D texture data in a completely non-destructive manner. This study presents a novel texture-based 3D liberation model that is capable of predicting liberation from 3D drill core image acquired by mu CT. The model takes preferential, phase-boundary, and random breakage into account with differing relative contributions to the liberation depending on the ore texture itself. The model was calibrated using experimental liberation data measured in 3D mu CT. After calibration, the liberation model was found to be capable of explaining on average of around 84% of the variance in the experimental liberation data. The generated particle population can be used for particle-based process simulation to evaluate the process responses of various ore textures subjected to various modes of breakage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据